There are generally two sides to the nature versus nurture debate of gender. The nature side of the argument states sex and gender is for the most part, biologically determined and that the two sexes think and act differently, often in opposing ways. Also that gender is fixed and not much changing across cultures and time periods. On the other side of the debate is nurture. The nurture side of the debate states that gender which is the way that sex is shown in the outside world, is socially manufactured.
Essay on Nature vs Nurture Debate - Words | Bartleby
In the nature Vs nurture debate it contrasts two important ways of explaining human growth and development, nature refers to an individual's innate qualities nativism. Nature is your genes, the physical and personality traits determined by your genes stay the same irrespective of where you were born and raised, for example; biological and family factors. Whereas nurture refers to personal experiences e. Nature refers to your childhood, or how you were brought up.
The argument between the two is concerned with whether behavior is inherited or acquired. Nature is behavior that is genetically inherited. Nature is thought of as pre-wiring because it is believed that we inherit our genes from our parents, therefore, our traits are directly linked to our behavior. Nurture on the other hand is behavior that is learned or acquired over time.
If you believe you were born already with a personality, then you take the side of nature. Two totally different theories, both which are believed to make us who we are. Nature, the more scientific theory of the two, is the belief that hereditary traits found in our genes make us who we are, believable but not very convincing when we consider the theory of nurture. Human beings learn new things everyday, as soon as we come in to the world, our learning process begins. One can argue nature makes someone who they are however; I have just given several examples of why that is not the case.